同一の発電機起動停止計画下での当日需給運用の最適化モデルと時系列モデルの比較検討

カテゴリ: 論文誌(論文単位)

グループ名: 【B】電力・エネルギー部門

発行日: 2021/03/01

タイトル(英語): Comparison of Optimization Model and Time-series Model for Intraday Electric Load Dispatching under Same Unit Commitment

著者名: 今中　政輝（名古屋大学未来材料・システム研究所），小豆澤　諒太（名古屋大学大学院工学研究科電気工学専攻），羅　恵丹（名古屋大学大学院工学研究科電気工学専攻），栗本　宗明（名古屋大学未来材料・システム研究所），杉本　重幸（名古屋大学未来材料・システム研究所），加藤　丈佳（名古屋大学未来材料・システム研究所）

著者名(英語): Masaki Imanaka (Institute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability, Nagoya University), Ryota Azukisawa (Dept. of Electrical Eng., Grad School of Eng., Nagoya University), Huidan Luo (Dept. of Electrical Eng., Grad School of Eng., Nagoya University), M

キーワード: 発電機起動停止計画，需給運用，LFC調整力，予測誤差調整力，最適化，ルールベース　　unit commitment，supply and demand operation，LFC reserve，reserve for forecast error，optimization，rule-base

要約(英語): Day-ahead unit commitment (DAUC) and intraday-optimization of electric load dispatching (IOED) are widely used to simulate power system operations with high-level renewable power integration. However, operation plans made by IOED models might be infeasible in reality, because the IOED model inputs actual renewable generation in a whole day. In order to check the feasibility, this paper compares simulation results of an IOED model with results of an intraday time-series electric load dispatching model (ITED model). Both models use the same DAUC results. The IOED model was modelled as a mixed integer linear problem, and the ITED model was modelled as a rule-based control model. Annual simulation results indicate that in terms of the supply shortage, the difference between the IOED model and the ITED model was not so large, especially for large shortages. On the other hand, operations of the pumped storage hydro were less frequent in the IOED model than in the ITED model.

本誌: 電気学会論文誌B（電力・エネルギー部門誌） Vol.141 No.3 （2021）

本誌掲載ページ: 255-263 p

原稿種別: 論文／日本語

電子版へのリンク: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ieejpes/141/3/141_255/_article/-char/ja/